エピソード

  • Judge Analisa Torres Denies Jay-Z's Bid To Unmask His Accuser

    Judge Analisa Torres Denies Jay-Z's Bid To Unmask His Accuser
    2025/06/11
    In a recent ruling, Judge Analisa Torres of the U.S. District Court granted the accuser in a high-profile lawsuit against Jay-Z the ability to remain anonymous. The accuser, identified only as "Jane Doe," had filed a lawsuit alleging sexual assault by the rapper and business mogul. Judge Torres acknowledged the significant public interest in the case but determined that the plaintiff's privacy and safety outweighed the need for public disclosure of her identity. The order emphasized the potential risks of harassment, intimidation, and stigma that could arise if her identity were revealed, particularly given Jay-Z's prominence and the heightened media scrutiny surrounding the case.


    The ruling does not impact the progression of the legal proceedings, as the court will ensure both parties have access to necessary information for a fair trial. However, it sets an important precedent in balancing the rights of accusers in sensitive cases with public transparency. Judge Torres underscored that allowing Jane Doe to proceed anonymously would not prejudice Jay-Z's defense or compromise the integrity of the judicial process.



    (commercial at 8:42)

    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    source:

    gov.uscourts.nysd.630244.53.0.pdf

    Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    15 分
  • Sienna Grace And Her Diddy Revelations

    Sienna Grace And Her Diddy Revelations
    2025/06/11
    Following Sean "Diddy" Combs' arrest on charges including sex trafficking and racketeering, Sienna Grace, a former associate, publicly shared her experiences. She recounted attending Combs' lavish parties, describing them as extravagant events with a glamorous facade. Grace alleged that these gatherings often involved excessive drinking and drug use, with Combs at the center of the activities.


    Grace further claimed that Combs leveraged his power and influence to manipulate and exploit young women, including herself. She detailed instances where she felt pressured to engage in sexual activities and suggested that Combs used his status to silence those who might speak out. Her revelations add to the mounting allegations against Combs, painting a picture of systemic abuse and misconduct.

    (commercial at 8:06)

    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


    source:

    OnlyFans model who partied with Diddy reveals the secret signals rappers use to pick women to sleep with | Daily Mail Online

    Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    11 分
  • Diddy Blasts The Feds Request To Put Dr. Dawn Hughes Back On The Stand (Part 1) (6/11/25)

    Diddy Blasts The Feds Request To Put Dr. Dawn Hughes Back On The Stand (Part 1) (6/11/25)
    2025/06/11
    In this letter to Judge Subramanian in United States v. Combs, the defense opposes the government’s request to recall expert witness Dr. Dawn Hughes for a second appearance during its case-in-chief. The defense argues that it relied on the Court’s original framework—reinforced in both the opening jury instructions and pretrial rulings—that each witness would testify only once. They further contend that recalling Dr. Hughes after her cross-examination would be unfair and prejudicial, as the defense structured its questioning with the understanding that it would be their sole opportunity to challenge her testimony during the government’s presentation of its case.

    The letter also raises concern about the signal it would send to the jury, suggesting that the Court is endorsing the government’s effort to rehabilitate a witness whose methodology and credibility were already subjected to extensive scrutiny. The defense emphasizes that it cannot repeat its prior cross-examination, nor should it be expected to. They argue that such a move is highly irregular and risks altering the fairness of the proceedings. The letter urges the Court to deny the government’s request and preserve the integrity of its prior rulings regarding the scope and structure of Dr. Hughes’s testimony.


    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    source:

    gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.393.0.pdf

    Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    13 分
  • Diddy Continues His Quest To Have Evidence And Testimony By Victim 2 (Jane Doe) Excluded (6/11/25)

    Diddy Continues His Quest To Have Evidence And Testimony By Victim 2 (Jane Doe) Excluded (6/11/25)
    2025/06/11
    In this letter to Judge Subramanian regarding the United States v. Combs trial, the defense objects to several exhibits the government intends to introduce during Jane Doe’s testimony—specifically, text messages and Notes App entries Jane used as a diary during her relationship with Sean Combs. The defense argues that many of these notes fail to meet the admissibility standards under Rules 801(d)(1)(B) and 803(3) of the Federal Rules of Evidence. They contend that some notes should be excluded entirely because they were written after Jane read Cassie Ventura’s lawsuit and after the government began its investigation, thereby lacking the necessary contemporaneity required under Rule 801(d)(1)(B). The defense also asserts that many of the notes do not meet Rule 803(3)’s standards regarding statements of then-existing mental state and should not be used to improperly guide Jane’s direct testimony or bolster her credibility.


    Additionally, the defense objects to Exhibit C-251, arguing it contains inadmissible hearsay in the form of messages between Jane and Kristina Khorram from December 2023. They also raise a Rule 106 objection concerning the admission of certain text messages without fuller contextual information that could alter their meaning. Finally, the defense opposes the admission of Government Exhibit E-171 on both hearsay grounds and under Rule 403, asserting that its probative value is substantially outweighed by the risk of unfair prejudice. The letter urges the Court to prevent what the defense views as improper use of these materials to frame and improperly enhance Jane Doe’s testimony.


    to contact me:


    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    source:

    gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.401.0.pdf

    Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    18 分
  • Diddy Trial: The Defense Continues It's Cross Examination Of Jane Doe (Victim 2) On Day 20 (Part 2) (6/11/25)

    Diddy Trial: The Defense Continues It's Cross Examination Of Jane Doe (Victim 2) On Day 20 (Part 2) (6/11/25)
    2025/06/11
    During the afternoon session on June 10th, 2025, at the federal trial of Sean “Diddy” Combs, the defense team continued its sustained cross-examination of Jane Doe Victim 2. The questioning remained sharply focused on attempting to undermine her credibility before the jury. Defense attorneys zeroed in on alleged inconsistencies between her in-court testimony and prior statements made to law enforcement and in civil litigation. They pressed her on precise dates, locations, and details of the alleged trafficking incidents she described, suggesting that elements of her narrative had shifted over time. The defense also highlighted text messages and communications that they argued were inconsistent with the portrayal of coercion and control presented by the government.

    Throughout the afternoon, Jane Doe 2 maintained her composure but showed visible signs of fatigue under the lengthy and at times repetitive questioning. The defense probed her connections to other accusers and her interactions with civil attorneys, implying possible coordination or financial motivation. Prosecutors objected at several points to the tone and scope of the questioning, but Judge Subramanian largely allowed the cross-examination to proceed. No new evidence was introduced; the session remained centered on testing the consistency and reliability of Jane Doe 2’s testimony. The court adjourned with the cross-examination still ongoing, setting the stage for its conclusion in the next session.


    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    source:

    June 10, 2025 - Day 20 of testimony in the Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs trial | CNN

    Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    15 分
  • The Feds Blast Diddy's Attempt To Exclude Jane Doe's (Victim 2) Personal Notes (6/11/25)

    The Feds Blast Diddy's Attempt To Exclude Jane Doe's (Victim 2) Personal Notes (6/11/25)
    2025/06/11
    In a letter to Judge Subramanian, the Government opposed the defense’s motion to strike exhibits GX E-331-F-R and GX E-331-H-R, which had already been admitted into evidence on June 6, 2025. The Government argued that these exhibits were properly admitted and remain central to proving the sex trafficking allegations against Sean Combs. The letter also addressed the defense’s arguments, raised in their June 8th filing and discussed in court, suggesting that the Government’s overarching theory of sex trafficking should be limited or curtailed.

    The prosecution maintained that its theory of sex trafficking, as presented to the jury, is fully supported by both the law and the evidence admitted thus far. The letter emphasized that the exhibits in question are not only relevant but critical to establishing the elements of the trafficking offense, particularly in demonstrating the coercion, pattern of conduct, and exploitation alleged. The Government urged the Court to reject the defense’s attempt to narrow the scope of the case or to exclude key evidence that speaks directly to the heart of the charges.


    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    source:

    gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.396.0.pdf

    Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    10 分
  • Mega Edition: The Feds Respond To Diddy's Motion For Pre Trial Release (6/11/25)

    Mega Edition: The Feds Respond To Diddy's Motion For Pre Trial Release (6/11/25)
    2025/06/11
    Sean Combs, the appellant in United States v. Combs, case number 24-CR-542 (AS), has filed a motion for pretrial release from federal custody. The motion argues that Combs does not pose a flight risk, citing his deep ties to the community, longstanding residency in the United States, and significant business investments. Combs' defense emphasizes that he is fully prepared to comply with any conditions of release, including electronic monitoring or home confinement, to ensure his presence at trial.

    The motion also contends that Combs’ continued detention negatively impacts his ability to prepare an adequate defense, citing limited access to legal counsel and case materials while in custody. The defense argues that pretrial release is essential to ensure a fair trial, noting that Combs has no history of failing to appear in court and that the charges against him, while serious, do not warrant indefinite pretrial incarceration. The decision on this motion remains pending before the appellate court.



    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

    source:

    gov.uscourts.ca2.234342fd-2384-426f-a4a4-aeca250ee12d.16.1_2.pdf

    Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    35 分
  • Mega Edition: Diddy And The Motion For Pre Trial Release (6/11/25)

    Mega Edition: Diddy And The Motion For Pre Trial Release (6/11/25)
    2025/06/11
    Sean Combs, the appellant in United States v. Combs, case number 24-CR-542 (AS), has filed a motion for pretrial release from federal custody. The motion argues that Combs does not pose a flight risk, citing his deep ties to the community, longstanding residency in the United States, and significant business investments. Combs' defense emphasizes that he is fully prepared to comply with any conditions of release, including electronic monitoring or home confinement, to ensure his presence at trial.

    The motion also contends that Combs’ continued detention negatively impacts his ability to prepare an adequate defense, citing limited access to legal counsel and case materials while in custody. The defense argues that pretrial release is essential to ensure a fair trial, noting that Combs has no history of failing to appear in court and that the charges against him, while serious, do not warrant indefinite pretrial incarceration. The decision on this motion remains pending before the appellate court.



    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

    source:

    gov.uscourts.ca2.234342fd-2384-426f-a4a4-aeca250ee12d.16.1_2.pdf

    Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    36 分