『The Epstein Chronicles』のカバーアート

The Epstein Chronicles

The Epstein Chronicles

著者： Bobby Capucci
無料で聴く

このコンテンツについて

 Jeffrey Epstein was a multi millionaire who had political and business ties to some of the most rich and powerful people in the world. From businessmen to politicians at the highest levels, Epstein broke bread with them all.

Yet for years the Legacy media and the rest of high society looked the other way and ignored his behavior as multiple women came forward with allegations of abuse.

Even after he was convicted and subsequently received a sweetheart deal those same so called elites welcomed him back with open arms.

Now after his death and the arrest of Maxwell, the real story is starting to come together and the curtain has begun to be drawn back and what it has revealed is truly disturbing.

From Princes to Ex Presidents, the cast of scoundrels in this play spans continents and political affiliations leaving us with a transcontinental criminal conspiracy possibly unlike any we have ever seen before.

In this podcast we will explore all of the levels of Jeffrey Epstein and his criminal enterprise.

From his most trusted assistants to obscure associates, we will leave no stone unturned as we swim through the muck searching for clarity and answers to some of the most pressing questions of the case.

From interviews with people directly involved in the case to daily updates, the Epstein Chronicles will have it all.

Just like our other project, The Jeffrey Epstein Show, you can expect no punches pulled and consistent content. We have covered the Epstein case daily(everyday since October 1st 2019) and will continue to do so until there are convictions. With a library of well over 1k shows, you can expect a ton of content coming your way including on scene reporting from the Maxwell trial and from places like Zorro Ranch.

Thank you for tuning in and I look forward to having you all along for the ride.




(Created and Hosted by Bobby Capucci)Copyright Bobby Capucci 政治・政府
エピソード
  • Diddy And Joseph Sherman Move To Dismiss The Candice McCrary Complaint WITH Prejudice (6/9/25)

    Diddy And Joseph Sherman Move To Dismiss The Candice McCrary Complaint WITH Prejudice (6/9/25)
    2025/06/09
    In the Reply Memorandum of Law supporting Sean Combs’ motion to dismiss the amended complaint in Thalia Graves v. Sean Combs and Joseph Sherman, Combs’ legal team reiterates that the plaintiff’s claims are both legally and factually insufficient. They argue that the amended complaint relies on conclusory allegations without concrete evidence of Combs’ direct involvement in the alleged misconduct. The reply further contends that the complaint improperly attempts to attribute liability to Combs through speculative inferences about his association with co-defendant Joseph Sherman, rather than demonstrating specific acts or intent required under the applicable legal standards.


    Additionally, Combs’ attorneys assert that many of the claims are time-barred and fall outside the statute of limitations. The reply memorandum emphasizes that the plaintiff’s attempt to revive these claims through generalized references to a purported ongoing pattern of misconduct is legally untenable. They also argue that the complaint fails to meet the heightened pleading standards required for claims of intentional infliction of emotional distress and other tort-based allegations. On these grounds, the defense urges the court to dismiss the amended complaint in its entirety, with prejudice.


    to contact me:


    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


    source:

    gov.uscourts.nysd.630450.87.0.pdf




    Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    16 分
  • Diddy Fires Back At The Government Over 'Mia' And Her Testimony (6/9/25)

    Diddy Fires Back At The Government Over 'Mia' And Her Testimony (6/9/25)
    2025/06/09
    In its May 28, 2025 letter to Judge Arun Subramanian, the defense responded to the government’s objections regarding several exhibits the defense intended to introduce during its cross-examination of the witness "Mia." The defense argued that the government’s objections lacked merit and that the exhibits in question were both relevant and admissible. The letter emphasized that these materials were critical for challenging Mia’s credibility, highlighting inconsistencies in her prior statements and demonstrating potential bias or motive, particularly in relation to her pending civil litigation and prior public statements.

    Additionally, the defense contended that excluding these exhibits would unfairly limit its ability to mount an effective cross-examination, violating Combs’ constitutional right to confront his accuser. The letter urged the court to overrule the government’s objections, stressing that the contested exhibits were essential to providing the jury with a full and accurate understanding of Mia’s testimony and credibility. The defense maintained that these materials were not prejudicial or misleading, but rather necessary for the jury to evaluate the truthfulness and reliability of the prosecution’s key witness.














    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    source:

    gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.383.0.pdf

    Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    20 分
  • Mega Edition: Judge Subramanian Denies Diddy's Last Ditch Effort To Get Evidence Tossed (6/9/25)

    Mega Edition: Judge Subramanian Denies Diddy's Last Ditch Effort To Get Evidence Tossed (6/9/25)
    2025/06/09
    In the federal case 24-CR-542 (AS), Sean Combs filed a motion to suppress evidence obtained from four separate warrants issued in 2024. These included a January warrant targeting Combs’s iCloud accounts and three March warrants that authorized searches of his Los Angeles and Miami residences, as well as his person and two cell phones. Combs argued that the government’s warrant applications were intentionally misleading and requested a Franks hearing—a legal proceeding used to challenge the truthfulness of statements made in an affidavit supporting a search warrant. He also contended that the warrants constituted unconstitutional “general warrants,” lacking the specificity required under the Fourth Amendment.

    Judge Arun Subramanian denied the motion, concluding that the warrant applications did not meet the legal standard required for a Franks hearing and that they were not impermissibly broad. The court found no evidence of deliberate falsehood or reckless disregard for the truth in the government’s affidavits, nor did it determine the warrants lacked sufficient particularity in describing the items to be seized. As a result, the evidence collected through these searches will be admissible at trial, marking a key procedural victory for the prosecution as it prepares to present a wide-ranging case against Combs involving allegations of racketeering and sex trafficking.

    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    source:

    gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.326.0.pdf

    Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    36 分

The Epstein Chroniclesに寄せられたリスナーの声

カスタマーレビュー：以下のタブを選択することで、他のサイトのレビューをご覧になれます。

Audible.co.jp

Amazon.co.jp
レビューはまだありません。