• Why Anchor-Baby Citizenship Is Actually Repugnant to the Constitution | 1/24/25

  • 2025/01/24
  • 再生時間： 1 時間 17 分
  • ポッドキャスト

Why Anchor-Baby Citizenship Is Actually Repugnant to the Constitution | 1/24/25

無料で聴く

ポッドキャストの詳細を見る

  • サマリー

  • Today, we offer the full case against anchor-baby jurisprudence. I’m joined by Amy Swearer, senior legal fellow at the Heritage Foundation, who has written scholarly papers showing conclusively that the plain meaning of the 14th Amendment was not adopting unqualified birthright citizenship for foreigners and most certainly not for illegal aliens and temporary visitors. The entire philosophy of citizenship, both pre- and post-adoption of the 14th Amendment, was built upon consent and allegiance. Amy explains why Wong Kim Ark expresses a false view of history but at the same time is clear that birthright citizenship cannot apply to those here against the national consent. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
    続きを読む 一部表示

あらすじ・解説

Today, we offer the full case against anchor-baby jurisprudence. I’m joined by Amy Swearer, senior legal fellow at the Heritage Foundation, who has written scholarly papers showing conclusively that the plain meaning of the 14th Amendment was not adopting unqualified birthright citizenship for foreigners and most certainly not for illegal aliens and temporary visitors. The entire philosophy of citizenship, both pre- and post-adoption of the 14th Amendment, was built upon consent and allegiance. Amy explains why Wong Kim Ark expresses a false view of history but at the same time is clear that birthright citizenship cannot apply to those here against the national consent. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
続きを読む 一部表示
activate_buybox_copy_target_t1

Why Anchor-Baby Citizenship Is Actually Repugnant to the Constitution | 1/24/25に寄せられたリスナーの声

カスタマーレビュー：以下のタブを選択することで、他のサイトのレビューをご覧になれます。

Audible.co.jp

Amazon.co.jp
レビューはまだありません。