Thinking LSAT

著者: Nathan Fox and Ben Olson
  • サマリー

  • Ben Olson and Nathan Fox started the Thinking LSAT Podcast to become better LSAT teachers and have some fun. Please 1) subscribe, 2) rate and review, and 3) send us questions: help@thinkinglsat.com. Don't pay for law school! Learn more at lsatdemon.com
    Nathan Fox and Ben Olson
    続きを読む 一部表示
activate_samplebutton_t1
エピソード
  • August LSAT Scores (Ep. 471)
    2024/09/09

    Ben and Nathan share what they’ve learned from LSAC about whether the exclusion of Logic Games had any impact on test scores this August. The guys also celebrate listeners’ successes on the August LSAT. They react to news of declining URM enrollment at top colleges. And they discuss why LSAT students should consider cutting back on social media.


    Study with our Free Plan

    Download our iOS app

    Watch Episode 471 on YouTube


    0:36 - August LSAT Shoutouts - The guys celebrate listeners’ successes on the August LSAT.

    7:45 - Underperforming on Test Day - LSAT Demon student Molly has twice underperformed her practice test scores on the official LSAT. Nathan and Ben instruct Molly to treat future tests like any practice test.

    22:17 - August LSAT Scores - LSAC reports that scores for the August 2024 LSAT are in line with scores from previous years.

    32:14 - Score Audit - Ben and Nathan advise listener David not to waste money on an LSAT score audit.

    39:33 - College Demographics - The guys discuss new demographic data on the first undergraduate class since the Supreme Court banned affirmative action in college admissions.

    47:29 - Pearls vs. Turds - Is social media hurting your LSAT study?

    55:44 - Word of the Week - The library is a common haunt for law students.

    続きを読む 一部表示
    59 分
  • How to Review Your Mistakes (Ep. 470)
    2024/09/02

    LSAT growth comes from thoroughly reviewing your mistakes. But what does a thorough review look like? Ben and Nathan describe their approach and explain why they don’t recommend keeping a wrong answer journal. The guys also compare law school to wizard school. They reject an impatient admissions strategy. And they consider potential risks associated with the military’s Funded Legal Education Program.


    Study with our Free Plan

    Download our iOS app

    Watch Episode 470 on YouTube


    1:31 - Confusing Writing - In a new study, cognitive scientists at MIT explain why legalese is so difficult to understand.

    9:13 - Improving in RC - An anonymous listener has been told that they won’t improve much in Reading Comprehension. Ben and Nathan tell Anonymous to ignore the haters.

    14:18 - Review - Nathan and Ben advocate a deep review of every mistake. But keeping a wrong answer journal is likely a waste of time.

    26:42 - Apply Now or Later? - Is it better to apply early with a subpar LSAT or to apply late with a great LSAT? Ben and Nathan ask: Why pick the lesser of two evils when you can avoid the evil entirely?

    34:49 - Comparative RC Passages - The guys outline their approach to comparative passages in Reading Comprehension.

    37:28 - JAG and FLEP - An LSAT Demon student warns listeners about potential risks associated with the military’s Funded Legal Education Program.

    48:28 - Word of the Week - You can mollify your test anxiety by improving at the test.

    続きを読む 一部表示
    53 分
  • Scholarship Shenanigans (Ep. 469)
    2024/08/26

    Ben and Nathan warn listeners about tactics that some law schools use to make mediocre scholarships appear better than they really are. The guys also discuss a new ABA regulation meant to standardize 1L learning outcomes. They double down on their advice to apply broadly. And they model their approach to Logical Reasoning on a Weaken question from PrepTest 123.


    Study with our Free Plan

    Download our iOS app

    Watch Episode 469 on YouTube


    2:27 - Fee Waiver Changes - LSAC now requires students with fee waivers to test twice in LawHub before registering for an official LSAT. Fee waiver recipients must also take the interactive course “How Do I Apply to Law School?”

    7:44 - New Rules for Law Schools - A new ABA regulation aims to make law school courses more uniform and give law students more feedback about their academic progress. Nathan and Ben doubt that the new rules will have their intended effects.

    15:51 - Better School or Better Price? - Is it better to attend a great law school for an OK price or an OK law school for a great price? Ben and Nathan urge listener Daniel to apply broadly and to focus on the LSAT before worrying about his law school decision.

    23:36 - Scholarship Shenanigans - Nathan and Ben shine a light on a shady scholarship practice.

    41:02 - Logical Reasoning: Weaken - The guys tackle a Weaken question from PrepTest 123. Try the question yourself. Then, listen to Ben and Nathan’s explanation.

    56:50 - Word of the Week - Adopt a parsimonious attitude regarding law school.

    続きを読む 一部表示
    1 時間

あらすじ・解説

Ben Olson and Nathan Fox started the Thinking LSAT Podcast to become better LSAT teachers and have some fun. Please 1) subscribe, 2) rate and review, and 3) send us questions: help@thinkinglsat.com. Don't pay for law school! Learn more at lsatdemon.com
Nathan Fox and Ben Olson

Thinking LSATに寄せられたリスナーの声

カスタマーレビュー:以下のタブを選択することで、他のサイトのレビューをご覧になれます。