We’d love to hear from you!!

Here are a few notable examples of businesses engaging in deliberate disinformation campaigns that are on public record. These cases highlight their intent and the security or societal impact:

1. Tobacco Industry’s "Doubt is Our Product" Campaign

• Intent: Tobacco companies funded scientific studies and public relations campaigns to sow doubt about the health risks of smoking. They aimed to mislead the public about the link between smoking and lung cancer, as revealed in the 1998 Tobacco Master Settlement Agreement.
• Security Impact: This disinformation harmed public health on a massive scale, delaying regulatory actions and contributing to millions of preventable deaths.

2. ExxonMobil and Climate Change Denial

• Intent: In the 1970s and 1980s, ExxonMobil's own scientists warned about the dangers of climate change. However, the company later funded organizations and campaigns to discredit climate science and downplay the role of fossil fuels in global warming.
• Security Impact: This misinformation contributed to environmental degradation and delayed global policy responses, exacerbating the climate crisis and increasing risks to global stability.

3. Facebook and Cambridge Analytica Scandal

• Intent: Cambridge Analytica harvested Facebook data to micro-target individuals with misleading political ads. While not a business promoting itself directly, the commercial services of Cambridge Analytica facilitated this operation, and Facebook’s lack of oversight enabled it.
• Security Impact: This disinformation undermined trust in democratic processes, contributing to political polarization and questions about election security.

4. Volkswagen Emissions Scandal ("Dieselgate")

• Intent: Volkswagen installed software in diesel cars to cheat emissions tests, falsely advertising them as environmentally friendly. The disinformation was a deliberate attempt to mislead regulators and customers.
• Security Impact: This damaged public trust in regulatory systems, increased environmental harm, and led to billions in fines, showcasing how disinformation can destabilize corporate and regulatory relationships.

5. Sackler Family and Purdue Pharma (Opioid Crisis)

• Intent: Purdue Pharma, owned by the Sackler family, aggressively marketed OxyContin as a safe and non-addictive painkiller while deliberately downplaying the risks of addiction.
• Security Impact: This disinformation campaign contributed significantly to the opioid epidemic, causing widespread societal and economic harm, including loss of lives and strains on healthcare and law enforcement systems.

6. Milk Industry vs. Alternative Milks

• Intent: Some dairy organizations have run campaigns portraying plant-based milks as nutritionally inferior or harmful, despite evidence to the contrary, in an effort to stifle competition.
• Security Impact: While less severe, such campaigns can mislead consumer choices and harm trust in advertising practices.

Lots of love from all of us at The Security Vine!

We’d love to hear from you!!

In this episode of The Security Vine, hosts Michael White, Dallin Law, and Yoyo discuss critical topics for security leaders, ranging from strategic alignment with business objectives, regulatory compliance, to emerging threats and incident response metrics.

Featuring humorous anecdotes and insightful examples, the episode focuses on the importance of effective communication between security professionals and C-suite executives.

Special guest Sarah Marie Baumgartner also shares her experiences merging nursing with security and participates in a light-hearted Q&A segment.

Lots of love from all of us at The Security Vine!

We’d love to hear from you!!

The hosts, Michael White, Dallin Law, and Yo Yo, introduce themselves and the SecurityVine podcast.

They delve into the topic of security fails, discussing the importance of learning from them rather than viewing them purely as negative outcomes.

The episode features humorous anecdotes of security mishaps, including misplaced surveillance cameras, ineffective physical barriers, and user errors that lead to vulnerabilities.

The conversation emphasizes the necessity of having professionals implement security measures and the concept of failures as learning opportunities.

Jeff Slotnick, a surprise guest, joins the discussion, sharing insights on risk assessments and robotics in security.

The episode concludes with a reflection on the recent U.S. presidential election and its implications for security policies.

Lots of love from all of us at The Security Vine!