• People Who Read People: A Behavior and Psychology Podcast

  • 著者: Zachary Elwood
  • ポッドキャスト

People Who Read People: A Behavior and Psychology Podcast

著者: Zachary Elwood
  • サマリー

  • This is a podcast about deciphering human behavior and understanding why people do the things they do. I, Zach Elwood, talk with people from a wide range of fields about how they make sense of human behavior and psychology. I've talked to jury consultants, interrogation professionals, behavior researchers, sports analysts, professional poker players, to name a few. There are more than 135 episodes, many of them quite good (although some say I'm biased). To learn more, go to PeopleWhoReadPeople.com.
    © 2024 People Who Read People: A Behavior and Psychology Podcast
    続きを読む 一部表示

あらすじ・解説

This is a podcast about deciphering human behavior and understanding why people do the things they do. I, Zach Elwood, talk with people from a wide range of fields about how they make sense of human behavior and psychology. I've talked to jury consultants, interrogation professionals, behavior researchers, sports analysts, professional poker players, to name a few. There are more than 135 episodes, many of them quite good (although some say I'm biased). To learn more, go to PeopleWhoReadPeople.com.
© 2024 People Who Read People: A Behavior and Psychology Podcast
エピソード
  • The polarization of Elon Musk: His high-contempt approach to political disagreement
    2025/01/12

    In June of 2024, I got an op-ed published in TheHill.com about Elon Musk's polarization -- specifically his so-called "affective polarization," which refers to how people perceive and treat their political opponents. Like many in our highly polarized, righteously angry society, Elon Musk treats the "other side" with much contempt and disdain. You can often find him insulting and demeaning people on his social media platform, as well as claiming to know with high certainty the hidden, malicious motives in his opponents' minds. This episode includes a reading of my op-ed and some additional observations. Topics discussed include: How conflict influences more and more people, on both "sides," to behave in high-contempt ways; how high-contempt, polarized approaches amplify the conflict; why high-contempt approaches are self-defeating for one's own goals and activism; how we can criticize "our side" to encourage better ways of engaging. To learn more about my polarization work, see https://american-anger.com.

    Learn more and sign up for a premium subscription at PeopleWhoReadPeople.com.

    続きを読む 一部表示
    18 分
  • Explanations for those 3 famous UFO videos from 2017
    2025/01/09

    Brian Dunning, creator of the podcast Skeptoid, made a documentary that brings a skeptical, analytical eye to the recent UFO craze – including those three famous UFO videos released by the Pentagon that got a whole lot of attention in a 2017 New York Times article. His documentary has the tongue-in-cheek title “The UFO Movie They Don’t Want You To See” and you can find it at www.briandunning.com/ufo. I think more people need to see Brian’s movie; it explained a lot and now I feel like I finally understand those videos. It’s been surprising how little attention the more rational, analytical explanations for those videos have gotten. If you’re someone who’s seen those videos and thought “What the hell is going on?” I think you’ll want to watch Brian’s movie. In this short episode I focus on one specific explanation for one of the videos in question. (I recommend watching my YouTube video version of this episode.)

    Learn more and sign up for a premium subscription at PeopleWhoReadPeople.com.

    続きを読む 一部表示
    19 分
  • Reading faces: A dumb 1960s book on reading physical facial traits
    2024/12/21

    I thought it'd be interesting to read a very dumb book from 1969 called "Face Reading: A Guide to How the Human Face Reveals Personality, Sexuality, Intelligence, Character, and More." It's about finding meaning in people's physical facial characteristics; not about reading emotions or expressions. To be clear: this is a very bad book with no sense/logic to it, basically astrology-like, and I'm reading it because I was curious what it said and thought some other people would find it interesting. I'm generally curious about the weird things people believe; also curious about some stereotypes that were present about facial characteristics in the 60s era. I thought it was an interesting relic and some other people might also think so.

    Learn more and sign up for a premium subscription at PeopleWhoReadPeople.com.

    続きを読む 一部表示
    1 時間 17 分

People Who Read People: A Behavior and Psychology Podcastに寄せられたリスナーの声

カスタマーレビュー:以下のタブを選択することで、他のサイトのレビューをご覧になれます。