In this episode, prompted by a listener's thought-provoking question, we tackle the contentious topic of abortion, its classification under the law, and what constitutes negligent homicide. We'll navigate the complexities of Ohio laws on murder and pregnancy termination, shed light on recent changes such as the reversal of Roe v. Wade, and discuss the implications of constitutional amendments versus statutory laws.

You'll gain insights into the essence of legal argumentation, the pivotal role of intent in legal contexts, and the challenging reality of separating emotions from logic in court decisions.

Whether you're a law student, a practicing attorney, or simply curious about the legal landscape, this episode promises a rich, nuanced look at some of the critical issues facing the legal world today.

Key Moments

00:00 Is abortion considered negligent homicide legally speaking?

03:30 Analyzing negligence homicide statute's legal requirements.

06:49 Roe v Wade reversed; Ohio amends constitution.

12:18 Abortion debates: legal vs constitutional challenges persist.

14:19 Ohioans' reproductive rights protected, abortion restricted post-viability.

18:24 Negligent homicide laws differ from abortion laws.

21:07 Unintentionally causing unborn child's death impacts sentencing.

23:42 Criminal plaintiff is government; tort differs significantly.

26:25 Emotions hinder objective analysis of decisions.

31:52 No definitive answers; understanding both sides essential.

32:48 Understanding appellate court decisions' structure and logic.

Got a question you want answered on the podcast? Call 614-859-2119 and leave us a voicemail. Steve will answer your question on the next podcast!

Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.

Recorded at Channel 511.

Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.

Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.

He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.

Steve has unique experience handling numerous high-publicity cases that have garnered national attention.

For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense.

Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law

Why should you refuse a breathalyzer test?

In Ohio, and many other states, there are two main ways you can be charged with OVI: operating a vehicle while impaired and a per se violation.

I explore how these charges differ, the implications of refusing a blood, breath, or urine test, and why it might be strategically beneficial.

Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.

Recorded at Channel 511.

Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.

Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.

He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.

Steve has unique experience handling numerous high publicity cases that have garnered national attention.

For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense.

Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law

When you're pulled over by the police, it can be a nerve-wracking experience. Understanding what the police can and cannot do during a traffic stop is crucial for anyone who drives.

One of the key cases discussed is Pennsylvania vs. Mims, a landmark Supreme Court decision that clarifies the authority police have during traffic stops. Through this case, we learn that officers can order drivers and passengers out of the vehicle for their safety, even during routine traffic stops. This ruling is crucial for understanding your rights and the legal obligations you face when interacting with law enforcement.

We also touch upon the concept of Terry stops, originating from the case Terry vs. Ohio. These stops allow police to briefly detain individuals if they have reasonable suspicion of criminal activity. It's a delicate balance between ensuring public safety and respecting individual rights, and our discussion aims to demystify these legal terms and concepts.

But why is compliance so important? Steve emphasizes refusing to follow lawful police orders can quickly escalate a situation. While it may feel unjust, the reality is that officers have the authority and tools to enforce compliance. Our legal system is designed to address any overreach or misconduct after the fact, not during the encounter. Steve advises cooperation during the stop, as it can prevent unnecessary complications and potential arrests.

For those concerned about DUI scenarios, this episode provides valuable insights. We discuss what happens if an officer suspects you've been drinking and how to navigate such situations lawfully. Understanding the difference between a lawful order and a request, like field sobriety tests, is crucial for protecting your rights.

Got a question you want answered on the podcast? Call 614-859-2119 and leave us a voicemail. Steve will answer your question on the next podcast!

Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.

Recorded at Channel 511.

Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.

Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.

He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.

Steve has unique experience handling numerous high-publicity cases that have garnered national attention.

For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense.

Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law