Julian Assange: Guilty of Journalism
2024/11/22
再生時間： 18 分
ポッドキャスト

カートのアイテムが多すぎます

ご購入は五十タイトルがカートに入っている場合のみです。

カートに追加できませんでした。

しばらく経ってから再度お試しください。

ウィッシュリストに追加できませんでした。

しばらく経ってから再度お試しください。

ほしい物リストの削除に失敗しました。

しばらく経ってから再度お試しください。

ポッドキャストのフォローに失敗しました

ポッドキャストのフォロー解除に失敗しました

Julian Assange: Guilty of Journalism

無料で聴く

ポッドキャストの詳細を見る

サマリー
Alright listeners, that was a fascinating discussion. We talked about Julian Assange and the work of WikiLeaks and it's clear that this case raises a lot of questions about journalism, transparency, and the balance of power. We heard about the challenges of running an organization like WikiLeaks and how important it is to handle sensitive information responsibly and ethically. We also touched on the role of mainstream media and its complex relationship with whistleblowers and organizations that challenge traditional news-gathering practices. The sources highlight the importance of public awareness and how crucial it is for individuals to examine the evidence for themselves and not rely solely on what governments or media outlets present. It's clear that this case is far from over, and we can expect continued debate about the role of whistleblowers, the limits of press freedom, and the right to information in a democratic society.

続きを読む一部表示

あらすじ・解説

Alright listeners, that was a fascinating discussion. We talked about Julian Assange and the work of WikiLeaks and it's clear that this case raises a lot of questions about journalism, transparency, and the balance of power. We heard about the challenges of running an organization like WikiLeaks and how important it is to handle sensitive information responsibly and ethically. We also touched on the role of mainstream media and its complex relationship with whistleblowers and organizations that challenge traditional news-gathering practices. The sources highlight the importance of public awareness and how crucial it is for individuals to examine the evidence for themselves and not rely solely on what governments or media outlets present. It's clear that this case is far from over, and we can expect continued debate about the role of whistleblowers, the limits of press freedom, and the right to information in a democratic society.

続きを読む一部表示