Hotel Bar Sessions

著者: Leigh M. Johnson Rick Lee and David Gunkel
  • サマリー

  • where the real philosophy happens
    © 2024 Leigh M. Johnson, Rick Lee, and David Gunkel
    続きを読む 一部表示
activate_samplebutton_t1
エピソード
  • The Ethics of Refusal (with Devonya Havis)
    2024/10/25

    When is it right, or even necessary, to say "no"?

    Refusing can be a powerful act—whether it’s standing up to authority, rejecting harmful norms, or pushing back against injustice. But when is saying “no” the right thing to do? And what are the stakes when we decide to refuse? Often our refusals are quotidian and inconsequential, but sometimes, and sometimes without our knowledge, they’re huge.

    We often underestimate how often we issue refusals, both large and small, and we don’t consider carefully enough the moral and political dimensions of those acts. It’s not always easy to decide when it is appropriate to refuse, and even when we know it’s necessary, it’s not always easy. Our guest today, Dr. Devonya Havis University of Buffalo), has been thinking about the ethics and politics of refusal for some time, and how how refusing to go along with something can be an act of courage, rebellion, or survival.

    We’re going to ask what happens when-- in the immortal words of Nancy Reagan-- you “just say no.”

    Full episode notes available at this link:
    episode-157-the-ethics-of-refusal-with-devonya-havis


    -------------------
    If you enjoy Hotel Bar Sessions podcast, please be sure to subscribe and submit a rating/review! Better yet, you can support this podcast by signing up to be one of our Patrons at patreon.com/hotelbarsessions!

    Follow us on Twitter/X @hotelbarpodcast, on Facebook, on TikTok, and subscribe to our YouTube channel!

    続きを読む 一部表示
    58 分
  • Meat
    2024/10/18

    Should we eat meat?

    Humans have been eating other animals for close to 2.5 million years--a fact that is evidenced by cut traces on fossil animal bones, surviving stone tools, and analyses of our ancestors' teeth. Does this evolutionary fact render meat-eating physiologically necessary and morally justifiable? Our ancestors did a lot of things to survive; is that sufficient reason to continue the practice? How they obtained this meaty source of protein was arguably very different from the industrial practices of animal agriculture that are justifiably criticized for their cruelty to non-human sentient creatures and their contribution to the global climate crisis.

    Can we as a species continue to eat meat? Or in doing so are we literally eating ourselves out of house and home? What about lab-grown Franken-meat, which Governor Ron DeSantis recently made illegal in the state of Florida? Is lab-grown meat a solution, or does it just feed the problem?

    How and why is the unassuming "Impossible Burger" now a subject of the culture wars?

    Full episode notes available at this link:
    https://hotelbarpodcast.com/podcast/episode-157-nature

    -------------------
    If you enjoy Hotel Bar Sessions podcast, please be sure to subscribe and submit a rating/review! Better yet, you can support this podcast by signing up to be one of our Patrons at patreon.com/hotelbarsessions!

    Follow us on Twitter/X @hotelbarpodcast, on Facebook, on TikTok, and subscribe to our YouTube channel!

    続きを読む 一部表示
    1 時間 5 分
  • Zionist ressentiment, the Left, and the Palestinian Question (with Zahi Zalloua)
    2024/10/11

    What can Frantz Fanon and Friedrich Nietzsche teach us about the Israeli/Palestinian conflict?

    This week, we're joined by Zahi Zalloua (Whitman College) to discuss the final chapter of his most recent book The Politics of the Wretched: Race, Reason, and Ressentiment (Bloomsbury, 2024)-- entitled "Zionist ressentiment, the Left, and the Palestinian Question"-- which offers a fresh lens through which to understand the complex affects and power dynamics that continue to fuel this ongoing struggle by focusing on what 19th C. German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche called ressentiment—a deep-seated feeling of injustice and grievance.

    Zalloua unpacks how a collective sense of moral outrage on the part of Zionists has been deployed to shield Israel from criticism by accusing pro-Palestinian advocates, and the Left more generally, of a “new anti-Semitism.” He contrasts this with Palestinian ressentiment, which he frames as a legitimate response to the ongoing reality of settler-colonialism and displacement. His work both critiques the complicity of liberal Zionism in maintaining the status quo and challenges us to reframe the way we understand both Zionist and Palestinian anger.


    Full episode notes available at this link:
    https://hotelbarpodcast.com/podcast/episode-155-the-palestinian-question-with-zahi-zalloua

    -------------------
    If you enjoy Hotel Bar Sessions podcast, please be sure to subscribe and submit a rating/review! Better yet, you can support this podcast by signing up to be one of our Patrons at patreon.com/hotelbarsessions!

    Follow us on Twitter/X @hotelbarpodcast, on Facebook, on TikTok, and subscribe to our YouTube channel!

    続きを読む 一部表示
    1 時間 3 分

あらすじ・解説

where the real philosophy happens
© 2024 Leigh M. Johnson, Rick Lee, and David Gunkel

Hotel Bar Sessionsに寄せられたリスナーの声

カスタマーレビュー:以下のタブを選択することで、他のサイトのレビューをご覧になれます。