Forensic Psychiatry in Probate Litigation: Assessing Testamentary Capacity and Undue Influence
カートのアイテムが多すぎます
カートに追加できませんでした。
ウィッシュリストに追加できませんでした。
ほしい物リストの削除に失敗しました。
ポッドキャストのフォローに失敗しました
ポッドキャストのフォロー解除に失敗しました
Forensic Psychiatry in Probate Litigation: Assessing Testamentary Capacity and Undue Influence
-
ナレーター：
-
著者：
このコンテンツについて
How do courts determine whether someone had the mental capacity to sign a will or whether they were manipulated into making estate decisions? In this episode of Emotional Damages, host Dr. Ambarin Faizi sits down with forensic psychiatrist Dr. Mark Levy and estate litigation attorney Dewey Harpainter to explore the complexities of testamentary capacity and undue influence in estate disputes.
Key topics discussed include:
- The legal and psychiatric criteria for testamentary capacity
- How undue influence is identified and proven in court
- The role of forensic psychiatry in evaluating estate and trust disputes
- Why retrospective capacity evaluations are challenging but critical in litigation
- Key considerations for attorneys handling will contests and trust disputes
For attorneys navigating estate litigation, elder law, or capacity-related claims, this episode provides essential insights into the intersection of law, mental health, and forensic psychiatry.
Have a topic you would like covered on the pod?
📧 Email us: podcast@fpamed.com
🔗 Connect with fpamed:
🌐 Visit our website.
👋 Follow us on LinkedIn.