In this episode of the Talent Sherpa Podcast, Jackson Lynch takes on a powerful paradox that holds many senior leaders back: the instinctive drive to be right rather than effective.

Many CHROs and senior executives enter debates prepared with data, logic, and airtight arguments, determined to win every discussion. Yet Jackson reveals a hard truth: being right can actually sabotage your influence. Leaders obsessed with winning every argument often miss the bigger picture; long-term impact, trust-building, and alignment across teams.

Jackson breaks down why the best CHROs and business leaders choose influence over correctness, strategic compromise over total victory, and sustained impact over short-term applause. He discusses why letting others claim credit, strategically yielding on smaller points, and maintaining a clear focus on long-term goals builds far more credibility than consistently proving your point.

Listeners learn exactly how politically savvy leaders quietly shape decisions, why the pre-meeting is more important than the actual debate, and how losing small arguments can strengthen your strategic leverage for future opportunities.

Have you ever left a meeting frustrated after “winning” your argument but losing influence, without realizing you must be ready to trade short-term correctness for sustained effectiveness.

This episode will transform how you approach every critical conversation.