
EP 10 Like, So Dramatic
カートのアイテムが多すぎます
カートに追加できませんでした。
ウィッシュリストに追加できませんでした。
ほしい物リストの削除に失敗しました。
ポッドキャストのフォローに失敗しました
ポッドキャストのフォロー解除に失敗しました
-
ナレーター:
-
著者:
このコンテンツについて
Episode 10 — Like, So Dramatic
Podcast: The Judgmental Podcast with Hugh & Christine
Theme: Judicial accountability, courtroom drama, and the politics of family court.
Episode Overview
In this candid conversation, Hugh and Christine pull back the curtain on the Louisville legal scene — from judges mentioning them in court to attorneys using TikTok posts as courtroom ammunition. They dissect recent courtroom encounters, questionable judicial rulings, and how strategy can make or break a case. The duo also reacts to viral courtroom clips, calls out systemic flaws, and examines the influence of money on court-ordered programs.
Key Topics & Segments
• When TikToks Make It Into the Court Record
o Christine shares stories of being name-dropped by judges, parenting coordinators, and
attorneys during active cases.
o How social media comments get twisted into legal leverage.
• The Alison Russell Controversy
o Accusations linking Judgey.com to Project 2025.
o Political labeling as a tactic to divide and discredit.
• Inside the Louisville Courthouse
o Positive feedback from attorneys and court staff versus calculated backlash.
o The surprising neutrality of Judgy despite local assumptions.
• Viral
Courtroom Clip Breakdown
o A probation revocation hearing turns tense as a judge lectures a defense attorney.
o Discussion of judicial demeanor, gender dynamics, and strategic advocacy in court.
• Judge Jessica Stone’s Facebook Post
o Why labeling critics “cartoons and media” misses the point.
o Concerns about fundamental gaps in legal understanding on the bench.
• When Judges Don’t Understand Business Income
o Misinterpretations of gross vs. net income in high-asset divorces.
o How this lack of financial literacy affects child support and maintenance rulings.
• The Receivership Case That Went Nowhere
o A cautionary tale about marital business assets being destroyed because a judge didn’t act.
• Court-Ordered Programs & the Money Trail
o Families in
Transition, Batterers Intervention, and DUI programs: do they work or just generate revenue?
o The parallels to the troubled teen industry and privatized incarceration.
Key Takeaways
• Public criticism of judges often provokes defensive — and sometimes revealing —
responses.
• Courtroom strategy is as important as legal knowledge, especially when judges are
inconsistent in enforcing...