DOGE Revolutionizes Government Efficiency: Trump and Musk Collaboration Sparks Nationwide Transformation of Federal Bureaucracy
カートのアイテムが多すぎます
ご購入は五十タイトルがカートに入っている場合のみです。
カートに追加できませんでした。
しばらく経ってから再度お試しください。
ウィッシュリストに追加できませんでした。
しばらく経ってから再度お試しください。
ほしい物リストの削除に失敗しました。
しばらく経ってから再度お試しください。
ポッドキャストのフォローに失敗しました
ポッドキャストのフォロー解除に失敗しました
DOGE Revolutionizes Government Efficiency: Trump and Musk Collaboration Sparks Nationwide Transformation of Federal Bureaucracy
-
ナレーター：
-
著者：
このコンテンツについて
DOGE’s influence is massive. According to an internal report obtained by the Washington Post, the department has placed its chosen personnel in key agencies including the Office of Personnel Management, United States Digital Service, and General Services Administration. This has allowed DOGE to halt contracts, cut spending, and, controversially, access sensitive government databases. NPR recently reported DOGE now controls databases vital to US farm and ranch payments, raising questions about the extent of their reach.
Some of the most dramatic headlines center on DOGE’s bold moves within federal agencies. By coordinating with the Office of Management and Budget, DOGE effectively dismantled the Agency for International Development and now has its sights set on departments that represent nearly two-thirds of the federal budget, including Health and Human Services and the Treasury. The speed and secrecy of these moves caught the attention of a federal judge, who noted DOGE’s ability to reshape or even eliminate agencies without congressional approval—an unprecedented exercise of power.
State governments, particularly those led by Republicans, are rushing to adopt their own DOGE-inspired efficiency drives. The Economic Times reports these efforts are sometimes more symbolic than substantive—governors like Kim Reynolds tout their own streamlined government efforts under the DOGE label, but critics argue many of these initiatives simply duplicate existing audit processes. Still, the branding around efficiency and slashing bureaucracy has proven to be politically potent, with at least 26 states starting similar efforts.
Critics question whether DOGE’s drastic cuts—like the highlighted 50% reduction in federal contract spending—come with hidden costs. Others allege error-filled reports and question the real savings, as seen with claims about USAID grants not matching actual figures. Meanwhile, some regulatory agencies reported pressure from DOGE to “rubber stamp” high-stakes projects, fueling constitutional concerns.
Listeners, thanks for tuning in and don’t forget to subscribe. This has been a quiet please production, for more check out quiet please dot ai.
For more http://www.quietplease.ai
Get the best deals https://amzn.to/3ODvOta