『Cunningham et al. v. Cornell University et al., Docket No. 23–1007』のカバーアート

Cunningham et al. v. Cornell University et al., Docket No. 23–1007

Cunningham et al. v. Cornell University et al., Docket No. 23–1007

無料で聴く

ポッドキャストの詳細を見る

このコンテンツについて

The Court held that to state a claim under ERISA section 1106(a)(1)(C), a plaintiff need only plausibly allege the elements contained in that provision itself, without addressing potential section 1108 exemptions. The Court reversed the Second Circuit's decision that required plaintiffs to also plead that a transaction was unnecessary or involved unreasonable compensation.


music for the podcast provided by ⁠ Dimitry Taras

Cunningham et al. v. Cornell University et al., Docket No. 23–1007に寄せられたリスナーの声

カスタマーレビュー:以下のタブを選択することで、他のサイトのレビューをご覧になれます。